I think Strickstein's abstract and interactive way of combining food and art represents the endless capabilities of art. It proves that the context of something can completely change its interpretation and definition. In any other place besides a museum this "jelly roll" would not be considered art. In a museum people are looking to interpret and experience. Rather than just being a messy experience it can be seen as a complete sensory experience. Strickstein's artistic vision is shown through her knowledge of both food and art being sensory experiences, she proves that the combination of these experiences produce a different and interactive way to relate to art and food. In the article she makes a very valid point that has been thoroughly discussed in our class, "I asked my parents: 'Why is this art?' " Strickstein recalled. "And that developed into a lifelong questioning back and forth of what makes art. I'm still working on the answer." I think this is a question that can never really be answered because the definition is dependent on so many other aspects that would have to include every factor and interpretaion.
HOULIHAN, M. (2009, April 26). Wrestling in jelly, for art's sake :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Galleries. Retrieved April 26, 2009, from http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/galleries/1544071,SHO-Sunday-art26.article
No comments:
Post a Comment